tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3930004102572847909.post15882291900638866..comments2009-07-17T22:37:45.540-04:00Tuxxienoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3930004102572847909.post-59738762058601005542009-07-17T22:27:18.574-04:002009-07-17T22:27:18.574-04:00I hope I&#39;m not the only one who doesn&#39;t see this as a new OS. This is simply a new default patch set and configuration manager. Regardless of you configuration tool, processor, or memory map it&#39;s still just Linux. It has all the benefits and drawbacks of other distros. The only real debate on any new flavor of Linux is the community, support and implementation ease.Hunterhttp://huntercobbs.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3930004102572847909.post-71570451749967008232009-07-17T05:19:50.887-04:002009-07-17T05:19:50.887-04:00I can never understand why some people decry a concept, such as &#39;another Linux OS&#39;, rather than wait for the product itself and give credible critique.<br /><br />It may well be that Chrome OS offers nothing of value to the community, or that it harmfully disrupts the other distros, but to be frank we don&#39;t know until it is released. And if those other platforms are in such a fragile state of existence, then perhaps we all need to get a little tougher and do some pruning. <br /><br />If not, then these smaller distros will continue to have their fans and these larger concerns can get on with taking their whack at Windows.Stevenhttp://www.stevenhuffer.co.uknoreply@blogger.com